Latest customs data for 2025 shows that disputes over mechanical and electrical equipment imports have increased by 37% year-on-year, with 68% stemming from flawed agreement clause designs. A manufacturing enterprise incurred 1.2 million yuan in demurrage fees due tomissing technical parameter descriptionsin the agreement, which prevented the imported precision machine tools from passing customs inspection. This real case highlights the importance of professional agreement drafting.
Core Clause Breakdown Guide
A standardized equipment agency import agreement should include the following key modules:
Subject Matter Clause
ISO standard naming rules for equipment models
Triple verification mechanism for technical parameters
Random accessory list confirmation process
Price Structure Clause
FOB vs. CIF selection strategies
Exchange Rate Fluctuation Compensation Mechanism
Prepayment and final payment milestones
New changes in 2025 delivery clauses
According to the latest version of the ICCs Incoterms, special attention must be paid to the following for equipment imports:
Adjusted inspection standards at destination ports (effective January 2025)
Dangerous goods transport declaration window shortened to 72 hours
Expanded scope of force majeure recognition
Fatal Blind Spots in Acceptance Clauses
A biopharmaceutical enterprise ignoredtrial operation period agreements, resulting in three months of idle operation for imported equipment. The agreement must clearly specify:
Acceptance test environment standards
Permissible performance deviation ranges
Designated third-party testing agency
Contract breach clause design techniques
By analyzing typical dispute cases from 2018-2025, we have summarized a three-tier liability system for contract breaches:
Tier 1: Calculation method for delayed delivery penalties
Tier 2: Remedial measures for quality defects
Tier 3: Termination conditions for fundamental breaches
3 mandatory checks before agreement signing
Check updates on technical barriers to trade (TBT) in export countries